A few weeks ago, I posted about mtDNA U3b and the predominance of this haplogroup among the European Roma populations. It is true that 55% of U3b is found in European Roma but U3bers are cautioned by Donald Locke, the administrator of the Romnichel Study Group at Family Tree DNA, not to jump to conclusions about Roma heritage based on U3b DNA alone. He recommends that male members of families be tested for South Asian Y-DNA traces or that autosomal testing be considered for South Asian influences.
I was curious about this and remembered that I had actually done testing with DNA Tribes, a group that assesses heritage through autosomal factors. Autosomal DNA testing is defined as a way to determine the ‘genetic percentages’ of a person’s ancestry from particular continents/regions or to identify the countries and “tribes” of origin on an overall basis. I went back to look at my results to see if there were any Indo or South Asian traces in my autosomal DNA.
I DO have percentages of DNA from North India, South India, Eastern India — but my largest percentages are from Arabia, North Africa, Levantine and Mesopotamia. DNA TRIBES remarks that Caucasian or West Eurasian populations are related to South Asian populations by virtue of their geographical proximity. European populations are descended almost entirely from Near Eastern populations. India contributes to the Near Eastern population at a rate of 21.8%. Thinking about these results made me realize that these are autosomal traces going back to the beginnings of time and the cradles of civilization for all of the world. Understanding this, I started wondering how unusual is it for anyone with European ancestry to have traces of dna from India or South Asia? Is it unusual at all? Perhaps most Europeans have traces of dna from these ancient civilizations.
















